The Return of the South Warren Basement
Like most years, next fall brings a lot of new changes to the Whitworth campus. Whitworth will see the opening of East Residence Hall, (named after famed Whitworth Trustee, George P. Eastresidencehall). Schumacher’s brief and torrid life as a dorm will end.Yes, three years from now, most people will be completely oblvious to the fact that Schumacher was once a dorm. In that respect, not much will change.
But perhaps the most interesting change is that the South Warren Basement will go from being full of girls to being full of guys.
Big deal, you say. A simple gender swap, you say. Nothing major, you say.
Ah, but that’s only because you don’t know your Whitworth History.
The South Warren Basement was all-male once before.
The year, was 1984.
And the South Warren Basement was famous. Check that– they we’re more than famous. Infamous, if you will.
The halls were full of guys of the wild and crazy persuasion. They were unsavory, unhinged, and downright untamable.
The South Warren Basement was a whirling dervish of id. It was a non-too-subtle speakeasy on a campus under strict prohibition. It was the seedy underbelly bubbling under the verdant and placid grass of Whitworth College.
Nationally, the mid-80s were the peak of binge drinking, of alcohol poisoning, and, most likely, of porcelain hugging.
The people of the South Warren Basement would drink, yes. And when they were caught — which they often were — they would counter by vandalizing their own hall — and then drinking some more.
This is the hall you’ve seen in a million college movies, the hall that would send the crusty old dean skyward-bellowing and fist-shaking like clockwork.
And like those college movies, an ultimatum was issued. Forget double, triple, secret probations. If there were any more hiijinks — ie, drunken debauchery — the hall would be shut down.
And when the hiijinks inevitably continued, and the hiijinks were inevitably discovered, the Basement Dwellars couldn’t pull off a last-ditch talent show/charity event/stirring speech to make everything all-better again.
In the middle of the year, with a sudden swift hand — the dudes of South Warren Basement were evicted. Every last one of them.
And they were replaced with young women. The thinking was, I suppose, that they would be more prim, more proper, more well-behaved.
“Open Conversation” Undergoes Name Change
Whitworth is making history. Last spring, “Open Conversation: Orientation” became the first officially chartered club to deal specifically with sexual orientation. This past school year I served as President of this club, holding events that encouraged discussion and doing my best to ensure students of all orientations had a safe place to go.
Now we make history again. Whitworth now has a club called “Open Conversation: Gay-Straight Association.” It’s the first Whitworth club to have “Gay-Straight” in the title, and the closest we’ve come to a Gay-Straight Alliance.
Why did I seek to change the name? This past year, I often had people coming up to me, wondering what our club was about. “Open Conversation? What? Is it a speech club?” Or, “Whose orientation? Is it about sex?” I wanted a name with more clarity, while still being a club that would foster discussion.
Of course, it took many years for us to even get as far as “Open Conversation: Orientation.” Mandi Curtain and Erika Prins told me many stories of their talks with various administrators, and their unsuccessful attempts to charter a club for LGBT students and their allies.
Previous attempts included “Open Conversation: GLBTQ&A.” Failed because it was still not inclusive enough.
So this past year I picked up where Erika and Mandi left off. After several conversations with Kathy Storm, we agreed on the new title.
The name is a compromise – many of the administrators felt it necessary for “Open Conversation” to remain in the title, while understanding that the purpose of the club and its inclusiveness is more apparent with the new name.
My first choice was to just have our club called “Gay-Straight Alliance,” and ideally be affiliated with the National Movement. I understand, though, why this can’t happen at Whitworth – at least not yet. The neutrality stance that Whitworth has chosen prevents it from endorsing “advocacy groups,” and as Kathy put it, “You don’t have to look far into the GSA website to find its political agenda. And that’s good – it should have one. But Whitworth can’t share in its mission.” (Not exact quote)
I can definitely appreciate the position that Whitworth and its administrators are in. A lot of faculty and admins want to be supportive because they don’t agree with the traditional or conservative interpretation of certain Bible verses. And the neutral stance is good in this sense – it allows them to work in a place where they don’t have to say “it’s a sin!” Other universities that have official negative stances wouldn’t be a good home for these allies.
Of course, I’d like to see Whitworth go further. I’d like the supportive faculty to be more vocal. I’d like to see more students show up to GSA events. I’d like to see Whitworth hire openly gay faculty.
Still, having a club where we can at least abbreviate it as “GSA” and not be lying is nice. Progress is being made. And who knows what the future will be like? Just yesterday, New Hampshire became the sixth state to offer marriage equality.
I’m often reminded of the words of the brilliant director of the Whitworth Choir, Marc Hafso: “It’s not a matter of if gays and lesbians receive full acceptance, but when.”
Here’s hoping, Marc. One step at a time.
Why a Whitworth Student Might Reject Christianity
There are a number of draws to a non-religious stance. Obviously, students can easily reject Christianity in favor of other religions, but I want to delve into the agnostic/atheistic/naturalist alternative.
Positivity I disagree with the very first premise of Core 350: that we live in a broken world. So in the first 5 minutes of class, I – and I’m not the only one – felt disconnected. Is the world imperfect? Sure – but not because it was once good and then broke. It’s because we live in a world of challenges and we constantly strive to make it a better and better place. Fallenness, sinfulness, Armageddon? These are delusions from an atheistic/naturalistic perspective. As college students and recent grads, we can be optimistic. There’s plenty of time for pessimism when we’re old.
Responsibility No one is guiding your life. There is no ultimate place in the cosmic storyline, no fate, no one holding your hand and helping you make the right decisions. It’s scary at first. But instead of wondering “What is someone else’s purpose for me?” you get to ask “What will lead me to a fulfilling life? What am I passionate about?”
Avoiding Distasteful People With the exception of a few bad historical characters, the worst atheists are people like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Daniel Dennett. What’s wrong with them? They are wickedly smart and they can be insulting to religious people. Well whoop-dee-do! Compared with some of the unsavory religious people out there – Bush, Cheney, Bin Laden – those guys aren’t such bad company. It’s much easier to criticize the “God Hates Fags” church when you’re actually on the other side of the fence, and that can be an appealing and morally soothing perspective.
Moral Sense Ever feel bad about people being punished for “crimes” that don’t have any victims? Like homosexuality? Or not hearing the gospel? All the questions that begin with “How could God-” are easily answered from an atheistic perspective. All the atheist has to figure out is “What on earth is morality, and where does ethics come from?” And sure, that can be challenging. But rather than thinking of what we need to do to please a watchful deity in the sky, we think about how to make the world a better place. All we humans have is each other, and the world is a tough place. If we figure out a way to get along we have the best chance to succeed. Oftentimes, religious dogma is no help at all.
No Dogma or Rituals All the Creeds and This-We-Believes go away. No more reconciling ancient manuscripts with scientific understanding. No more arguments about which sects truly understand which sacraments the best. No more praying to the right saint. Nothing binds an atheist to a particular, unified set of beliefs. Nothing tears them apart and causes strife over interpretations or practices. Isn’t that nice?
A Lot of Tough Questions Start to Make Sense Why does the human eye have a blind spot? A vestigial tail? Why the billions of years of cosmic evolution leading up to the infinitesimal existence of the human species? Advances in neuroscience and psychology provide so many answers to so many questions. And that is not to say that atheism does not create its own difficult questions, but, generally speaking, the explanations all occur within the realm of the natural world. It makes everything seem less complex – at least to someone who holds that perspective, like me.
That’s all I can think of at this point. Anyone have any to add?